Recent comments from SciRate

Aram Harrow Jan 16 2014 05:05 UTC

This paper reads as though Dyakonov stopped reading the literature after the original FTQC paper by Aharonov and Ben-Or. In discussions a few months ago, I mentioned the following papers that address his criticisms:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0504218
http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6131
http://ar

...(continued)
Cedric Beny Jan 24 2013 07:46 UTC

Actually, I recklessly submitted this to a machine learning conference, with some open review system. So, we will soon see some opinion there:
http://openreview.net/iclr2013

Daniel Lidar Jul 09 2012 04:02 UTC

Thanks for the comment Random Reader. The assumption that H_I is bounded is in fact not necessary for any of our derivations. The bound that troubled you under Eq. (12) has been replaced in v2 of the paper with a new and tighter bound, which essentially uses only the properties of the bath correlati

...(continued)
Daniel Lidar Feb 04 2013 18:06 UTC

This journal lists me as a member of their editorial board; I have never been contacted by them and certainly haven't agreed to serve in this role, nor do I have any such intention. The two "Editors in Chief" have told me that the same holds for them.

Ashley Feb 05 2013 09:55 UTC

Unless I'm missing something, the editorial board information for "Quantum Information Review" now seems to have disappeared...

CS Sep 07 2012 12:47 UTC

Nice paper! Gives agood overview of what id possible and what is not with respect to bit commitment from relativistic assumptions. I guess it would be natural to reference this paper by Crepeau and Co. as well: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25385-0_22

Random Reader Jun 21 2012 02:06 UTC

I wonder if the spin-boson bath example presented on p. 10 of this preprint is internally consistent with the proposed internally-consistent derivation. The interaction Hamiltonian H_I operator in (61) for the spin boson model is neither bounded nor is it trace class, thus the trace and operator no

...(continued)
Oded Dec 10 2013 14:44 UTC

You might consider citing this paper by Ambainis et al. :
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003136

Seiji Armstrong Oct 31 2013 00:48 UTC

This result is very encouraging for experimentalists dealing with CV clusters. While the various thresholds are quite high with respect to current squeezing technologies, the mere existence of a near-feasible threshold gives us something tangible to work towards.

Thanks for keeping CV clusters re

...(continued)
Matt May 28 2012 04:35 UTC

Testing out the comments.