Thomas Klimpelgentzen

Nov 25 2017 13:16 UTC
Nov 24 2017 10:44 UTC
Nov 13 2017 09:24 UTC
Nov 07 2017 10:35 UTC
Oct 24 2017 20:24 UTC
Oct 24 2017 20:24 UTC
Oct 06 2017 09:44 UTC
Sep 27 2017 09:13 UTC
Sep 27 2017 09:09 UTC
Thomas Klimpel scited Designing Strassen's algorithm
Jul 27 2017 09:19 UTC
Thomas Klimpel scited Aspects of Chaitin's Omega
Jul 27 2017 09:15 UTC
Jul 11 2017 23:30 UTC
May 12 2017 07:42 UTC
Apr 21 2017 21:26 UTC
Apr 20 2017 09:16 UTC
Thomas Klimpel commented on Evaluating gambles using dynamics

This paper [appeared][1] in February 2016 in the peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal Chaos by the American Institute of Physics (AIP).

It has been reviewed publicly by amateurs both [favorably][2] and [unfavorably][3]. The favorable review took the last sentence of the abstract ("These invalidate a commonly cited argument for bounded utility functions.") as the main message of the paper. The unfavorable review regards this merely as a side argument, and instead evaluates "this paper, which claims to present a new and preferred way (compared to expected utility) of evaluating gambles, as well as major rethinking of economic theory" on the basis that it would propose a revolutionary new perspective on decision theory.

[1]: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/chaos/26/2/10.1063/1.4940236
[2]: http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/36749024#36749024
Thomas Klimpel scited A Ghost at $\omega_1$