This paper [appeared] in February 2016 in the peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal Chaos by the American Institute of Physics (AIP).
It has been reviewed publicly by amateurs both [favorably] and [unfavorably]. The favorable review took the last sentence of the abstract ("These invalidate a commonly cited argument for bounded utility functions.") as the main message of the paper. The unfavorable review regards this merely as a side argument, and instead evaluates "this paper, which claims to present a new and preferred way (compared to expected utility) of evaluating gambles, as well as major rethinking of economic theory" on the basis that it would propose a revolutionary new perspective on decision theory.