# Statistics Theory (stat.TH)

• Consider the partially linear model (PLM) with random design: $Y=X^T\beta^*+g(W)+u$, where $g(\cdot)$ is an unknown real-valued function, $X$ is $p$-dimensional, $W$ is one-dimensional, and $\beta^*$ is $s$-sparse. Our aim is to efficiently estimate $\beta^*$ based on $n$ i.i.d. observations of $(Y,X,W)$ with possibly $n<p$. The popular approaches and their theoretical properties so far have mainly been developed with an explicit knowledge of some function classes. In this paper, we propose an adaptive estimation procedure, which automatically adapts to the model via a tuning-insensitive bandwidth parameter. In many cases, the proposed procedure also proves to attain weaker scaling and noise requirements than the best existing ones. The proof rests on a general method for determining the estimation accuracy of a perturbed M-estimator and new U-statistics tools, which are of independent interest.

Alessandro Dec 09 2015 01:12 UTC

Hey, I've already seen this title! http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0401

Richard Kueng Mar 08 2015 22:02 UTC

Neither, Frédéric! Replacing fidelity by superfidelity still requires optimizing over all density matrices. However, the Birkhoff-von Neumann Theorem (see Lemma 1) allows for further restricting this optimization to n scalar variables w.l.o.g.---Theorem 2. Arguably, this greatly simplifies the geome

...(continued)
Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2015 11:31 UTC

I fell for that clickbait title and read the paper. I still don’t get why von Neumann didn't want us to know about this weird trick? And which weird trick? The use of superfidelity or the use of non-physical density matrices like $\sigma^\sharp$?

Noon van der Silk Mar 03 2015 03:20 UTC

I took the liberty of uploading the IPython notebook as a github [gist](https://gist.github.com), so it's viewable [here](http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/gist.githubusercontent.com/silky/b14fa42c6d5475a3a724/raw/887c19fb04581f1a33f9d03370e4b7b3a33c2ea8/ferrie_kueng_bayes_est_fid.ipynb).