The main SciRate homepage is down (when not logged in). We are working to fix it. See for updates.

Statistics Theory (stat.TH)

  • PDF
    We analyze the bias correction methods using jackknife, bootstrap, and Taylor series. We focus on the binomial model, and consider the problem of bias correction for estimating $f(p)$, where $f \in C[0,1]$ is arbitrary. We characterize the supremum norm of the bias of general jackknife and bootstrap estimators for any continuous functions, and demonstrate the in delete-$d$ jackknife, different values of $d$ may lead to drastically different behavior in jackknife. We show that in the binomial model, iterating the bootstrap bias correction infinitely many times may lead to divergence of bias and variance, and demonstrate that the bias properties of the bootstrap bias corrected estimator after $r-1$ rounds is exactly the same as that of the $r$-jackknife estimator if a bounded coefficients condition is satisfied.
  • PDF
    We study minimax lower bounds for function estimation problems on large graph when the target function is smoothly varying over the graph. We derive minimax rates in the context of regression and classification problems on graphs that satisfy an asymptotic shape assumption and with a smoothness condition on the target function, both formulated in terms of the graph Laplacian.
  • PDF
    Consider the case that we observe $n$ independent and identically distributed copies of a random variable with a probability distribution known to be an element of a specified statistical model. We are interested in estimating an infinite dimensional target parameter that minimizes the expectation of a specified loss function. In \citegenerally_efficient_TMLE we defined an estimator that minimizes the empirical risk over all multivariate real valued cadlag functions with variation norm bounded by some constant $M$ in the parameter space, and selects $M$ with cross-validation. We referred to this estimator as the Highly-Adaptive-Lasso estimator due to the fact that the constrained can be formulated as a bound $M$ on the sum of the coefficients a linear combination of a very large number of basis functions. Specifically, in the case that the target parameter is a conditional mean, then it can be implemented with the standard LASSO regression estimator. In \citegenerally_efficient_TMLE we proved that the HAL-estimator is consistent w.r.t. the (quadratic) loss-based dissimilarity at a rate faster than $n^{-1/2}$ (i.e., faster than $n^{-1/4}$ w.r.t. a norm), even when the parameter space is completely nonparametric. The only assumption required for this rate is that the true parameter function has a finite variation norm. The loss-based dissimilarity is often equivalent with the square of an $L^2(P_0)$-type norm. In this article, we establish that under some weak continuity condition, the HAL-estimator is also uniformly consistent.
  • PDF
    A new test of normality based on a standardised empirical process is introduced in this article. The first step is to introduce a Cramér-von Mises type statistic with weights equal to the inverse of the standard normal density function supported on a symmetric interval $[-a_n,a_n]$ depending on the sample size $n.$ The sequence of end points $a_n$ tends to infinity, and is chosen so that the statistic goes to infinity at the speed of $\ln \ln n.$ After substracting the mean, a suitable test statistic is obtained, with the same asymptotic law as the well-known Shapiro-Wilk statistic. The performance of the new test is described and compared with three other well-known tests of normality, namely, Shapiro-Wilk, Anderson-Darling and that of del Barrio-Matrán, Cuesta Albertos, and Rodrı́guez Rodrı́guez, by means of power calculations under many alternative hypotheses.

Recent comments

Alessandro Dec 09 2015 01:12 UTC

Hey, I've already seen this title!

Richard Kueng Mar 08 2015 22:02 UTC

Neither, Frédéric! Replacing fidelity by superfidelity still requires optimizing over all density matrices. However, the Birkhoff-von Neumann Theorem (see Lemma 1) allows for further restricting this optimization to n scalar variables w.l.o.g.---Theorem 2. Arguably, this greatly simplifies the geome

Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2015 11:31 UTC

I fell for that clickbait title and read the paper. I still don’t get why von Neumann didn't want us to know about this weird trick? And which weird trick? The use of superfidelity or the use of non-physical density matrices like $\sigma^\sharp$?

Noon van der Silk Mar 03 2015 03:20 UTC

I took the liberty of uploading the IPython notebook as a github [gist](, so it's viewable [here](