# Statistics Theory (stat.TH)

• The estimation of a log-concave density on $\mathbb{R}$ is a canonical problem in the area of shape-constrained nonparametric inference. We present a Bayesian nonparametric approach to this problem based on an exponentiated Dirichlet process mixture prior and show that the posterior distribution converges to the log-concave truth at the (near-) minimax rate in Hellinger distance. Our proof proceeds by establishing a general contraction result based on the log-concave maximum likelihood estimator that prevents the need for further metric entropy calculations. We also present two computationally more feasible approximations and a more practical empirical Bayes approach, which are illustrated numerically via simulations.
• We introduce the notion of the essential tangent bundle of a parametrized measure model and the notion of reduced Fisher metric on a (possibly singular) 2-integrable measure model. Using these notions and a new characterization of $k$-integrable parametrized measure models, we extend the Cramér-Rao inequality to $2$-integrable (possibly singular) statistical models for general $\varphi$-estimations, where $\varphi$ is a $V$-valued feature function and $V$ is a topological vector space.
• This paper provides several statistical estimators for the drift and volatility parameters of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process driven by fractional Brownian motion, whose observations can be made either continuously or at discrete time instants. First and higher order power variations are used to estimate the volatility parameter. The almost sure convergence of the estimators and the corresponding central limit theorems are obtained for all the Hurst parameter range $H\in (0, 1)$. The least squares estimator is used for the drift parameter. A central limit theorem is proved when the Hurst parameter $H \in (0, 1/2)$ and a noncentral limit theorem is proved for $H\in[3/4, 1)$. Thus, the open problem left in the paper by Hu and Nualart (2010) is completely solved, where a central limit theorem for least squares estimator is proved for $H\in [1/2, 3/4)$.
• In this paper, we develop an upper bound for the SPARSEVA (SPARSe Estimation based on a VAlidation criterion) estimation error in a general scheme, i.e., when the cost function is strongly convex and the regularized norm is decomposable for a pair of subspaces. We show how this general bound can be applied to a sparse regression problem to obtain an upper bound for the traditional SPARSEVA problem. Numerical results are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the suggested bound.
• This paper proposes an algorithm to estimate the parameters, including time delay, of continuous time systems based on instrumental variable identification methods. To overcome the multiple local minima of the cost function associated with the estimation of a time delay system, we utilise the useful redundancy technique. Specifically, the cost function is filtered through a set of low-pass filters to improve convexity with the useful redundancy technique exploited to achieve convergence to the global minimum of the optimization problem. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
• Bands of vector-valued functions $f:T\mapsto\mathbb{R}^d$ are defined by considering convex hulls generated by their values concatenated at $m$ different values of the argument. The obtained $m$-bands are families of functions, ranging from the conventional band in case the time points are individually considered (for $m=1$) to the convex hull in the functional space if the number $m$ of simultaneously considered time points becomes large enough to fill the whole time domain. These bands give rise to a depth concept that is new both for real-valued and vector-valued functions.

Alessandro Dec 09 2015 01:12 UTC

Hey, I've already seen this title! http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0401

Richard Kueng Mar 08 2015 22:02 UTC

Neither, Frédéric! Replacing fidelity by superfidelity still requires optimizing over all density matrices. However, the Birkhoff-von Neumann Theorem (see Lemma 1) allows for further restricting this optimization to n scalar variables w.l.o.g.---Theorem 2. Arguably, this greatly simplifies the geome

...(continued)
Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2015 11:31 UTC

I fell for that clickbait title and read the paper. I still don’t get why von Neumann didn't want us to know about this weird trick? And which weird trick? The use of superfidelity or the use of non-physical density matrices like $\sigma^\sharp$?

Noon van der Silk Mar 03 2015 03:20 UTC

I took the liberty of uploading the IPython notebook as a github [gist](https://gist.github.com), so it's viewable [here](http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/gist.githubusercontent.com/silky/b14fa42c6d5475a3a724/raw/887c19fb04581f1a33f9d03370e4b7b3a33c2ea8/ferrie_kueng_bayes_est_fid.ipynb).