History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

  • PDF
    Subject of this article is the relationship between modern cosmology and fundamental physics, in particular general relativity as a theory of gravity on one side, together with its unique application in cosmology, and the formation of structures and their statistics on the other. It summarises arguments for the formulation for a metric theory of gravity and the uniqueness of the construction of general relativity. It discusses symmetry arguments in the construction of Friedmann-Lemaître cosmologies as well as assumptions in relation to the presence of dark matter, when adopting general relativity as the gravitational theory. A large section is dedicated to $\Lambda$CDM as the standard model for structure formation and the arguments that led to its construction, and to the of role statistics and to the problem of scientific inference in cosmology as an empirical science. The article concludes with an outlook on current and future developments in cosmology.
  • PDF
    The very humble origins of the Cyberspace, and all the related developments that smoothly conspired and converged towards this concept, making its emergence possible, as the personal computer, TEX and LATEX, the Fax, the internet, the cellphone, and the World Wide Web, are discussed, always from a personal perspective. A separate, comprehensive explanation of the reasons for the appearance and subsequent evolution of each of these different phenomena, with explicit assessments and a future prospective of the main subject, is presented.

Recent comments

Mohammad Bavarian Sep 08 2016 03:58 UTC

So beautifully written!

Māris Ozols Sep 07 2016 13:03 UTC

John also has an excellent series of 7 blog posts covering this material:

Joel Klassen Feb 07 2016 17:57 UTC

The conversation amongst philosophers about the notion of free will and its relationship to determinism has a rich and nuanced history. It's disappointing to see someone who should know better be so flippantly dismissive of that conversation.

Niel de Beaudrap Apr 03 2015 18:42 UTC

I put this on my reading list after the recent update, having a casual interest in foundations. While I don't have quite enough physics background to see if anything is being swept under the rug, I found it an interesting point of view, written clearly and without mysticism. In particular, I now un

Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2014 10:03 UTC

I read this paper as an appendix of an unwritten Fantasy novel, where a 21st century cosmologist is trapped in an alternate Aristotelian 13th century universe ! Thanks for the nice read !

Dave Bacon May 10 2013 02:53 UTC

This paper only considers two party entanglement. If you move to three parties, then the entangled states in the GK theorem include the GHZ state and the measurements that you need in order to violate Bell inequalities for these states. Thus the argument in this paper seems to fall apart for n>2 q

Han-Hsuan Lin May 13 2013 19:00 UTC

GHZ state is separable if you trace out any subsystem. Therefore I don't think you can violate Bell inequality with GHZ state.

Frank E. S. Steinhoff May 13 2013 01:45 UTC

"the entangled states in the GK theorem include the GHZ state and the measurements that you need in order to violate Bell inequalities for these states"

If this is true, the GHZ state and all local measurements' projectors needed for Bell inequality violation must be in the same MUB polytope, con

Aram Harrow May 16 2013 02:10 UTC

Han-Hsuan, I think Dave is using the term "Bell inequality" to refer more generally to entanglement witnesses that are can be constructed from correlated local measurements.

In the multipartite setting, these witnesses distinguish the entangled state from any tripartite separable state. Here's t