History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

  • PDF
    A covariant relativistic formalism for the electron-photon and nuclear dynamics is summarised making more accurate predictions in agreement with experiments for Compton scattering in shells with large electron binding energy. An exact solution for the Dirac equation for an electron in the nuclear Coulomb field is obtained, in order to write the relativistic dynamics for this QED process. This is a preparation for the calculation of the relativistic cross-section for Compton scattering on bound electrons; as a precision test for QED.

Recent comments

Mohammad Bavarian Sep 08 2016 03:58 UTC

So beautifully written!

Māris Ozols Sep 07 2016 13:03 UTC

John also has an excellent series of 7 blog posts covering this material:

Joel Klassen Feb 07 2016 17:57 UTC

The conversation amongst philosophers about the notion of free will and its relationship to determinism has a rich and nuanced history. It's disappointing to see someone who should know better be so flippantly dismissive of that conversation.

Niel de Beaudrap Apr 03 2015 18:42 UTC

I put this on my reading list after the recent update, having a casual interest in foundations. While I don't have quite enough physics background to see if anything is being swept under the rug, I found it an interesting point of view, written clearly and without mysticism. In particular, I now un

Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2014 10:03 UTC

I read this paper as an appendix of an unwritten Fantasy novel, where a 21st century cosmologist is trapped in an alternate Aristotelian 13th century universe ! Thanks for the nice read !

Dave Bacon May 10 2013 02:53 UTC

This paper only considers two party entanglement. If you move to three parties, then the entangled states in the GK theorem include the GHZ state and the measurements that you need in order to violate Bell inequalities for these states. Thus the argument in this paper seems to fall apart for n>2 q

Han-Hsuan Lin May 13 2013 19:00 UTC

GHZ state is separable if you trace out any subsystem. Therefore I don't think you can violate Bell inequality with GHZ state.

Frank E. S. Steinhoff May 13 2013 01:45 UTC

"the entangled states in the GK theorem include the GHZ state and the measurements that you need in order to violate Bell inequalities for these states"

If this is true, the GHZ state and all local measurements' projectors needed for Bell inequality violation must be in the same MUB polytope, con

Aram Harrow May 16 2013 02:10 UTC

Han-Hsuan, I think Dave is using the term "Bell inequality" to refer more generally to entanglement witnesses that are can be constructed from correlated local measurements.

In the multipartite setting, these witnesses distinguish the entangled state from any tripartite separable state. Here's t