- arXiv.org
- Applied Physics
- Popular Physics
- History and Philosophy of Physics
- Fluid Dynamics
- Optics
- Physics and Society
- Biological Physics
- Space Physics
- General Physics
- Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
- Atomic Physics
- Geophysics
- Atomic and Molecular Clusters
- Medical Physics
- Plasma Physics
- Instrumentation and Detectors
- Physics Education
- Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
- Chemical Physics
- Computational Physics
- Classical Physics
- Accelerator Physics

- Number Theory
- Statistics Theory
- History and Overview
- Information Theory
- Analysis of PDEs
- Algebraic Geometry
- Combinatorics
- Symplectic Geometry
- Mathematical Physics
- Complex Variables
- Probability
- Operator Algebras
- Group Theory
- Representation Theory
- Numerical Analysis
- Quantum Algebra
- Geometric Topology
- Dynamical Systems
- Differential Geometry
- Logic
- Optimization and Control
- General Topology
- General Mathematics
- Metric Geometry
- Algebraic Topology
- Functional Analysis
- Classical Analysis and ODEs
- Spectral Theory
- Category Theory
- Commutative Algebra
- Rings and Algebras
- K-Theory and Homology

- Neural and Evolutionary Computing
- Symbolic Computation
- Information Theory
- Mathematical Software
- Emerging Technologies
- General Literature
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Learning
- Operating Systems
- Programming Languages
- Software Engineering
- Multiagent Systems
- Social and Information Networks
- Sound
- Information Retrieval
- Databases
- Formal Languages and Automata Theory
- Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
- Computer Science and Game Theory
- Artificial Intelligence
- Cryptography and Security
- Computational Complexity
- Discrete Mathematics
- Hardware Architecture
- Numerical Analysis
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Other Computer Science
- Systems and Control
- Digital Libraries
- Robotics
- Networking and Internet Architecture
- Logic in Computer Science
- Computational Geometry
- Data Structures and Algorithms
- Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
- Graphics
- Performance
- Computation and Language
- Multimedia
- Computers and Society

- Dec 15 2017 astro-ph.SR physics.hist-ph arXiv:1712.05399v1The BAA Variable Star Section is the world's longest established organisation for the systematic observation of variable stars, having been formed in 1890. Its database contains nearly 3 million measurements going back to 1840 and is an important resource for researchers. The aim of this Presidential Address is to reveal some of the lesser known tales that lie deep within the database. This includes bringing to life stories about some of the people that were involved, especially in the early years, including Joseph Baxendell, Mary Adela Blagg and Arthur Stanley Williams, as well as shedding light on some of the stars that have been observed. Finally we look to the future as the Variable Star Section builds on the legacy of its forebears, ensuring that it shall always stay ahead of the curve.

Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism

Christopher A. Fuchs May 15 2017 22:36 UTCJoel Klassen May 15 2017 22:01 UTC

...(continued)Dear Ruediger,

Thanks for your prompt and cordial response. I hope you'll forgive the absence of address and signoff in my previous comment, my excitement got the better of my internet etiquette.

I think I understand what you are saying. The notion is that by making a statement like "a rubidiu

Ruediger Schack May 15 2017 14:00 UTC

...(continued)Dear Joel,

Thank you for this question about Fuchs's paper. As you suggest, if taken out of context, the tenet "My probabilities cannot tell nature what to do" is a little mystifying. No serious thinker should believe that *his* probabilities tell nature what to do. The actual content of the tene

Joel Klassen May 13 2017 19:20 UTC

...(continued)At the end of page 19, section 2.2 you introduce the tenet

"My Probabilities Cannot Tell Nature What To Do"

Can you elaborate on why it is necessary to include this tenet in QBism? Or more precisely, in what way is QBism unique in having this tenet? Are there any serious thinkers that are pro

Christopher A. Fuchs May 12 2017 17:14 UTC

...(continued)Dear Michel,

1. It was just a goofy thing that I thought would get the readers to smile. But Wolfgang Pauli did have quite a mystical interest in 137 precisely because of its connection to the fine structure constant. This is documented in quite a number of places; the book by Suzanne Gieser,

Planat May 11 2017 09:03 UTC

Dear Christopher,

1. Could you comment on the connection to the fine structure constant in footnote 15 in which you write "Implicit in it is the number 137!"?

2. Would the Qbism philosophy be destroyed by restricting to IC's instead of SICs as in https://scirate.com/arxiv/1704.02749#807?

Thanks.

Māris Ozols Sep 07 2016 13:03 UTC

John also has an excellent series of 7 blog posts covering this material:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/struggles-continuum-part-1/

Joel Klassen Feb 07 2016 17:57 UTC

The conversation amongst philosophers about the notion of free will and its relationship to determinism has a rich and nuanced history. It's disappointing to see someone who should know better be so flippantly dismissive of that conversation.

Niel de Beaudrap Apr 03 2015 18:42 UTC

...(continued)I put this on my reading list after the recent update, having a casual interest in foundations. While I don't have quite enough physics background to see if anything is being swept under the rug, I found it an interesting point of view, written clearly and without mysticism. In particular, I now un

- Supported by Silverpond.