# Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)

• The ability to develop, use, and refine models of experimental systems is a nationally recognized learning outcome for undergraduate physics lab courses. However, no assessments of students' model-based reasoning exist for upper-division labs. This study is the first step toward development of a modeling assessment for optics labs. In order to identify test objectives that are likely relevant across many institutional contexts, we interviewed 19 optics instructors. Interviews specifically focused on activities that incorporate photodiodes, which are ubiquitous in optics labs. The study design was informed by the Modeling Framework for Experimental Physics. This framework conceptualizes modeling as consisting of multiple subtasks: making measurements, constructing system models, comparing data to predictions, proposing causes for discrepancies, and enacting revisions to models or apparatuses. We found that each modeling subtask was identified by at least half of interviewees as an important learning outcome their course, as was the iterative nature of modeling. Based on these results, we argue that test objectives should include probing students' competence with most modeling subtasks, and test items should be designed to elicit students' justifications for choosing particular modeling pathways. Additionally, our findings suggest that an assessment of students' model-based reasoning in optics labs should be contextualized by setups that incorporate lasers, lenses, photodiodes, and voltmeters, and by photodiode models that account for saturation, background noise, and bandwidth limitations. In addition to discussing these and other implications for assessment, we also identify future areas of research related to the role of modeling in optics labs.
• We describe a procedure in which elementary education students fabricate 3-cell, $\approx5 ~\mathrm{Watt}$, $1.6~\mathrm{V}$ solar panels. The panels are manufactured at a cost of about $\$6\$ each. The paper also describes a series of characterization activities that we have had our students complete with the panels once fabrication is complete. Specifically, our students have determined: the dependence of panel power on load resistance, the variation of open-circuit panel voltage between different students' work, and energy capture efficiency. The activity also allows opportunities for discussion of manufacturing and process improvement which can provide unusual connections to engineering and technology learning outcomes.