# Statistics Theory (math.ST)

• Mar 22 2018 math.ST stat.TH arXiv:1803.07645v1
Smoothing splines can be thought of as the posterior mean of a Gaussian process regression in a certain limit. By constructing a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with an appropriate inner product, the Bayesian form of the V-spline is derived when the penalty term is a fixed constant instead of a function. An extension to the usual generalized cross-validation formula is utilized to find the optimal V-spline parameters.
• This paper discusses fluctuations of linear spectral statistics of high-dimensional sample covariance matrices when the underlying population follows an elliptical distribution. Such population often possesses high order correlations among their coordinates, which have great impact on the asymptotic behaviors of linear spectral statistics. Taking such kind of dependency into consideration, we establish a new central limit theorem for the linear spectral statistics in this paper for a class of elliptical populations. This general theoretical result has wide applications and, as an example, it is then applied to test the sphericity of elliptical populations.
• The Gaussian width is a fundamental quantity in probability, statistics and geometry, known to underlie the intrinsic difficulty of estimation and hypothesis testing. In this work, we show how the Gaussian width, when localized to any given point of an ellipse, can be controlled by the Kolmogorov width of a set similarly localized. This connection leads to an explicit characterization of the estimation error of least-squares regression as a function of the true regression vector within the ellipse. The rate of error decay varies substantially as a function of location: as a concrete example, in Sobolev ellipses of smoothness $\alpha$, we exhibit rates that vary from $(\sigma^2)^{\frac{2 \alpha}{2 \alpha + 1}}$, corresponding to the classical global rate, to the faster rate $(\sigma^2)^{\frac{4 \alpha}{4 \alpha + 1}}$. We also show how the local Kolmogorov width can be related to local metric entropy.

Alessandro Dec 09 2015 01:12 UTC

Hey, I've already seen this title! http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0401

Richard Kueng Mar 08 2015 22:02 UTC

Neither, Frédéric! Replacing fidelity by superfidelity still requires optimizing over all density matrices. However, the Birkhoff-von Neumann Theorem (see Lemma 1) allows for further restricting this optimization to n scalar variables w.l.o.g.---Theorem 2. Arguably, this greatly simplifies the geome

...(continued)
Frédéric Grosshans Mar 05 2015 11:31 UTC

I fell for that clickbait title and read the paper. I still don’t get why von Neumann didn't want us to know about this weird trick? And which weird trick? The use of superfidelity or the use of non-physical density matrices like $\sigma^\sharp$?

Noon van der Silk Mar 03 2015 03:20 UTC

I took the liberty of uploading the IPython notebook as a github [gist](https://gist.github.com), so it's viewable [here](http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/gist.githubusercontent.com/silky/b14fa42c6d5475a3a724/raw/887c19fb04581f1a33f9d03370e4b7b3a33c2ea8/ferrie_kueng_bayes_est_fid.ipynb).