Operator Algebras (math.OA)

• This note presents an analysis of a class of operator algebras constructed as cross-sectional algebras of flat holomorphic matrix bundles over a finitely bordered Riemann surface. These algebras are partly inspired by the bundle shifts of Abrahamse and Douglas. The first objective is to understand the boundary representations of the containing $C^*$-algebra, i.e. Arveson's noncommutative Choquet boundary for each of our operator algebras. The boundary representations of our operator algebras for their containing $C^*$-algebras are calculated, and it is shown that they correspond to evaluations on the boundary of the Riemann surface. Secondly, we show that our algebras are Azumaya algebras, the algebraic analogues of $n$-homogeneous $C^*$-algebras.
• Continuing our study of spectral triples on quantum domains, we look at unbounded invariant and covariant derivations in the quantum annulus. In particular, we investigate whether such derivations can be implemented by operators with compact parametrices, a necessary condition in the definition of a spectral triple.
• Oct 18 2017 math.OA math.CO math.QA arXiv:1710.06199v1
We give a definition of partition C*-algebras: To any partition of a finite set, we assign algebraic relations for a matrix of generators of a universal C*-algebra. We then prove how certain relations may be deduced from others and we explain a partition calculus for simplifying such computations. This article is a small note for C*-algebraists having no background in compact quantum groups, although our partition C*-algebras are motivated from those underlying Banica-Speicher quantum groups (also called easy quantum groups). We list many open questions about partition C*-algebras that may be tackled by purely C*-algebraic means, ranging from ideal structures and representations on Hilbert spaces to K-theory and isomorphism questions. In a follow up article, we deal with the quantum algebraic structure associated to partition C*-algebras.
• Helgason showed that a given measure $f\in M(G)$ on a compact group $G$ should be in $L^2(G)$ automatically if all random Fourier series of $f$ are in $M(G)$. We explore a natural analogue of the theorem in the framework of compact quantum groups and apply the obtained results to study complete representability problem for convolution algebras of compact quantum groups as an operator algebra.
• We develop a generalization of quantitative $K$-theory, which we call controlled $K$-theory. It is powerful enough to study the $K$-theory of crossed product of $C^*$-algebras by action of étale groupoids and discrete quantum groups. In this article, we will use it to study groupoids crossed products. We define controlled assembly maps, which factorize the Baum-Connes assembly maps, and define the controlled Baum-Connes conjecture. We relate the controlled conjecture for groupoids to the classical conjecture, and to the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. This allows to give applications to Coarse Geometry. In particular, we can prove that the maximal version of the controlled coarse Baum-Connes conjecture is satisfied for a coarse space which admits a fibred coarse embedding, which is a stronger version of a result of M. Finn-Sell.

Jalex Stark Apr 06 2017 22:46 UTC

However, one should note that I_3322 may be able to do something that this paper doesn't. William's work leaves open the question of whether there are games with infinite-dimensional tensor product strategies but no finite-dimensional ones. Some of us might expect that I_3322 has this property.

Laura Mančinska Mar 28 2017 13:09 UTC

Great result!

For those familiar with I_3322, William here gives an example of a nonlocal game exhibiting a behaviour that many of us suspected (but couldn't prove) to be possessed by I_3322.

Marco Piani Mar 07 2014 14:46 UTC

The author writes "My ideas towards the proof of these results in this paper originates from the observations made by Carlen in [13]". Actually, the first main result is a direct corollary of theorem 2.3 of [13], in the sense of directly applying theorem 2.3 of [13], which regards monotonicity of re

...(continued)