General Topology (math.GN)

  • PDF
    Given a metric space $(X,d)$, we say that a mapping $\chi: [X]^{2}\longrightarrow\{0.1\}$ is an isometric coloring if $d(x,y)=d(z,t)$ implies $\chi(\{x,y\})=\chi(\{z,t\})$. A free ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on an infinite metric space $(X,d)$ is called metrically Ramsey if, for every isometric coloring $\chi$ of $[X]^{2}$, there is a member $U\in\mathcal{U}$ such that the set $[U]^{2}$ is $\chi$-monochrome. We prove that each infinite ultrametric space $(X,d)$ has a countable subset $Y$ such that each free ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on $X$ satisfying $Y\in\mathcal{U}$ is metrically Ramsey. On the other hand, it is an open question whether every metrically Ramsey ultrafilter on the natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ with the metric $|x-y|$ is a Ramsey ultrafilter. We prove that every metrically Ramsey ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on $\mathbb{N}$ has a member with no arithmetic progression of length 2, and if $\mathcal{U}$ has a thin member then there is a mapping $f:\mathbb{N}\longrightarrow\omega $ such that $f(\mathcal{U})$ is a Ramsey ultrafilter.

Recent comments

Juan Bermejo-Vega Aug 24 2015 09:08 UTC

@John Bryden. Could you use quotes "" or bloquotes > when citing? It improves readability and avoids potential misunderstandings.

Noon van der Silk Aug 22 2015 00:59 UTC

Note that it's not possible to submit papers to SciRate directly; this site simply aggregates information from other sites. However, I've added an issue relating to potentially marking withdrawn papers - https://github.com/scirate/scirate/issues/318.

John Bryden Aug 21 2015 22:17 UTC

Aside from the comment above there are other comments that should be made.

A very important comment is this. The fraudulent paper of Ntatin, is quite simply NOT correct.
By this I mean the following: In 1999 Florian Deloup and I began a project that we called "The linking form conjecture for 3-m

...(continued)
John Bryden Aug 21 2015 20:48 UTC

This article submitted by B. Ntatin and W. Glunt was published in a new Journal called Advances in Pure Mathematics (APM for short) in September of 2013. In July 2014 the Journal APM RETRACTED this article. The reason that APM retracted this article to quote the Journal is :

The following arti

...(continued)