- In this note we present an explicit realization of the affine vertex algebra $V^{cri}(\frak{gl}(1 \vert 1)) $ inside of the tensor product $F\otimes M$ where $F$ is a fermionic verex algebra and $M$ is a commutative vertex algebra. This immediately gives an alternative description of the center of $V^{cri}(\frak{gl}(1 \vert 1) ) )$ as a subalgebra $M _ 0$ of $M$. We reconstruct the Molev-Mukhin formula for the Hilbert-Poincare series of the center of $V^ {cri}(\frak{gl}(1 \vert 1) )$. Moreover, we construct a family of irreducible $V^{cri}(\frak{gl}(1 \vert 1))$ -modules realized on $F$ and parameterized by $\chi^+, \chi ^- \in {\Bbb C}((z)). $ We propose a generalization of $V^ {cri}(\frak{gl}(1 \vert 1))$ as a critical level version of the super $\mathcal W_{1+\infty}$ vertex algebra.
- Jun 29 2017 math.OC arXiv:1706.09019v1There is a growing need to develop optimization methods to enable the reliable and efficient operation of power systems that have a large fraction of their power supplied from intermittent renewable resources. In this paper, we formulate the robust AC optimal power flow (RAC-OPF) problem as a two-stage robust optimization problem with recourse. This problem amounts to an infinite-dimensional nonconvex optimization problem, which is computationally intractable, in general. By restricting the space of recourse policies to those which are affine in the uncertain problem data, we provide a method to approximate RAC-OPF from within by a finite-dimensional semidefinite program. The resulting semidefinite program yields an affine recourse policy that is guaranteed to be feasible for RAC-OPF. We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed optimization method on a nine-bus power system with different levels of renewable resource penetration and uncertainty.
- Jun 29 2017 math.OC arXiv:1706.08996v1The clustering of a data set into disjoint clusters is one of the core tasks in data analytics. Many clustering algorithms exhibit a strong contrast between a favorable performance in practice and bad theoretical worst-cases. Prime examples are least-squares assignments and the popular k-means algorithm. We are interested in this contrast and approach it using methods of polyhedral theory. Several popular clustering algorithms are readily connected to finding a vertex of the so-called bounded-shape partition polytopes. The vertices correspond to clusterings with extraordinary separation properties, in particular allowing the construction of a separating power diagram such that each cluster has its own cell. The geometric structure of these polytopes reveals useful information: First, we are able to quantitatively measure the space of all sites that allow construction of a separating power diagrams for a clustering by the volume of its normal cone. This gives rise to a new quality criterion for clusterings, and explains why good clusterings are also the most likely to be found by some classical algorithms. Second, we characterize the edges of the bounded-shape partition polytopes. Through this, we obtain an explicit description of the normal cones. This allows us to compute measures with respect to the new quality criterion, and even compute most stable sites for the separation of clusters. The hardness of these computations depends on the number of edges incident to a vertex, which may be exponential. However, this computational effort is rewarded with a wealth of information that can be gained from the results, which we highlight using a toy example.
- Jun 29 2017 math.DS arXiv:1706.09385v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.PR arXiv:1706.09374v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.DG arXiv:1706.09368v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.NA arXiv:1706.09360v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.OA arXiv:1706.09358v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AG arXiv:1706.09348v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.NT arXiv:1706.09342v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.NT arXiv:1706.09341v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.GT arXiv:1706.09333v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.RT arXiv:1706.09329v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AG arXiv:1706.09328v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AG arXiv:1706.09327v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.PR arXiv:1706.09326v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.NT arXiv:1706.09320v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.FA arXiv:1706.09312v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.GT arXiv:1706.09311v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.DS arXiv:1706.09307v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.CV arXiv:1706.09306v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.DG arXiv:1706.09292v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AG arXiv:1706.09291v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.GR arXiv:1706.09286v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.CO arXiv:1706.09267v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.DS arXiv:1706.09265v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AP arXiv:1706.09260v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.NT arXiv:1706.09246v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.OC arXiv:1706.09242v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.FA arXiv:1706.09237v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.CA arXiv:1706.09227v1
- Jun 29 2017 math.AP arXiv:1706.09223v1