Software Engineering (cs.SE)

  • PDF
    Traditional software engineering programming paradigms are mostly object or procedure oriented, driven by deterministic algorithms. With the advent of deep learning and cognitive sciences there is an emerging trend for data-driven programming, creating a shift in the programming paradigm among the software engineering communities. Visualizing and interpreting the execution of a current large scale data-driven software development is challenging. Further, for deep learning development there are many libraries in multiple programming languages such as TensorFlow (Python), CAFFE (C++), Theano (Python), Torch (Lua), and Deeplearning4j (Java), driving a huge need for interoperability across libraries.
  • PDF
    [Context] In software engineering research, emphasis is given to sound evaluations of new approaches. While industry surveys or industrial case studies are preferred to evaluate industrial applicability, controlled experiments with student participants are commonly used to determine measurements such as effectiveness and efficiency of a proposed approach. [Objectives] In this paper, we elaborate on the current state of the art of controlled experiments using student participants. As student participants are commonly only reluctantly accepted in scientific communities and threats regarding the generalizability are quite obvious, we want to determine how widespread controlled experiments with student participants are and in which settings they are used. [Methods] This paper reports on a systematic mapping study using high-quality journals and conferences from the software engineering field as data sources. We scanned all papers published between 2010 and 2014 and investigated all papers reporting student experiments in detail. [Results] From 2788 papers under investigation 175 report results from controlled experiments. 109 (62.29%) of these controlled experiments have been conducted with student participants. Most experiments used undergraduate student participants, recruited students on a voluntary basis, and set them tasks to measure their comprehension. However, many experiments lack information regarding the students' recruitment and other important factors. [Conclusions] In conclusion, student participation in software engineering experiments can be seen as a common evaluation approach. In contrast, there seems to be little knowledge about the threats to validity in student experiments, as major drivers such as the recruitment are not reported at all.