Mathematical Software (cs.MS)

  • PDF
    Spectral clustering is one of the most popular graph clustering algorithms, which achieves the best performance for many scientific and engineering applications. However, existing implementations in commonly used software platforms such as Matlab and Python do not scale well for many of the emerging Big Data applications. In this paper, we present a fast implementation of the spectral clustering algorithm on a CPU-GPU heterogeneous platform. Our implementation takes advantage of the computational power of the multi-core CPU and the massive multithreading and SIMD capabilities of GPUs. Given the input as data points in high dimensional space, we propose a parallel scheme to build a sparse similarity graph represented in a standard sparse representation format. Then we compute the smallest $k$ eigenvectors of the Laplacian matrix by utilizing the reverse communication interfaces of ARPACK software and cuSPARSE library, where $k$ is typically very large. Moreover, we implement a very fast parallelized $k$-means algorithm on GPUs. Our implementation is shown to be significantly faster compared to the best known Matlab and Python implementations for each step. In addition, our algorithm scales to problems with a very large number of clusters.
  • PDF
    Floating point error is a drawback of embedded systems implementation that is difficult to avoid. Computing rigorous upper bounds of roundoff errors is absolutely necessary for the validation of critical software. This problem of computing rigorous upper bounds is even more challenging when addressing non-linear programs. In this paper, we propose and compare two new algorithms based on Bernstein expansions and sparse Krivine-Stengle representations, adapted from the field of the global optimization, to compute upper bounds of roundoff errors for programs implementing polynomial and rational functions. We also provide the convergence rate of these two algorithms. We release two related software package FPBern and FPKriSten, and compare them with the state-of-the-art tools. We show that these two methods achieve competitive performance, while providing accurate upper bounds by comparison with the other tools.

Recent comments

Zoltán Zimborás May 28 2014 04:42 UTC

It's a bit funny to look at a formally verified proof of the CLT :), here it is online: