Aug 17 2017 cs.GT
This paper develops the theory of mechanism redesign by which an auctioneer can reoptimize an auction based on bid data collected from previous iterations of the auction on bidders from the same market. We give a direct method for estimation of the revenue of a counterfactual auction from the bids in the current auction. The estimator is a simple weighted order statistic of the bids and has the optimal error rate. Two applications of our estimator are A/B testing (a.k.a., randomized controlled trials) and instrumented optimization (i.e., revenue optimization subject to being able to do accurate inference of any counterfactual auction revenue).
In this paper, we present a new model and mechanism for auctions in two-sided markets of buyers and sellers, with budget constraints imposed on buyers. Our mechanism is viewed as a two-sided extension of the polyhedral clinching auction by Goel et al., and enjoys various nice properties, such as incentive compatibility of buyers, individual rationality, pareto optimality, strong budget balance. Our framework is built on polymatroid theory, and hence is applicable to a wide variety of models that include multiunit auctions, matching markets and reservation exchange markets.
In this paper, we model a Stackelberg game in a simple Gaussian test channel where a human transmitter (leader) communicates a source message to a human receiver (follower). We model human decision making using prospect theory models proposed for continuous decision spaces. Assuming that the value function is the squared distortion at both the transmitter and the receiver, we analyze the effects of the weight functions at both the transmitter and the receiver on optimal communication strategies, namely encoding at the transmitter and decoding at the receiver, in the Stackelberg sense. We show that the optimal strategies for the behavioral agents in the Stackelberg sense are identical to those designed for unbiased agents. At the same time, we also show that the prospect theoretic distortions at both the transmitter and the receiver are both smaller than the expected distortion, thus making behavioral agents more contended than unbiased agents. Consequently, the presence of cognitive biases reduces the need for transmission power in order to achieve a given distortion at both transmitter and receiver.