This paper [appeared] in February 2016 in the peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal Chaos by the American Institute of Physics (AIP).
It has been reviewed publicly by amateurs both [favorably] and [unfavorably]. The favorable review took the last sentence of the abstract ("These invalid
Here is a link for those who also haven't heard of SciPost before: https://scipost.org/
This is the very first paper of SciPost, waiting for the first paper of "Quantum" (http://quantum-journal.org). There are radical (and good!) changes going on in scientific publishing.
This is a beautiful set of lecture notes.
Good question! There shouldn't be any contradiction with the correspondence principle. The reason here is that the quantum models are built to simulate the output behaviour of macroscopic, classical systems, and are not necessarily macroscopic themselves. When we compare quantum and classical comple
Interesting results. But, just wondering, does it contradict to the correspondence principle?
I am no expert at all on strongly correlated systems or topological order, but since you refer to information theory in your abstract, let me still ask you: What is the justification for using $I_2(A:B) = H_2(A) + H_2(B) - H_2(AB)$ for the Rényi mutual information? This quantity has no information-t
This article has generated a fair bit of discussion. But I found a few of the statements puzzling (Edgar Lozano also). Take for example, Theorem 1 (ii) (reversibility) which appears to contradict a number of previous results. Should we understand your work function as "work in the paradigm where we
Thanks a lot for your comments. Yes, $X$ can be any state and we've made this clearer now in the paper - we don't need to assume that it is diagonal.
We've also noted more prominently that achievability of our result in the full thermodynamics case is only when the target state is b
A question to Theorem 1:
In the process description in eq. (2), you mention that $X$ is any arbitrary state. However, in the proof of Theorem 1, in the converse part you assume that $[X,\sigma]=0$, or equivalently that $X$ is diagonal in the eigenbasis of $\sigma$. Similarly, in the achievability