# Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)

• We consider a one-dimensional infinite lattice where at each site there sits an agent carrying a velocity, which is drawn initially for each agent independently from a common distribution. This system evolves as a Markov process where a pair of agents at adjacent sites exchange their positions with a specified rate, while retaining their respective velocities, only if the velocity of the agent on the left site is higher. We study the statistics of the net displacement of a tagged agent $m(t)$ on the lattice, in a given duration $t$, for two different kinds of rates: one in which a pair of agents at sites $i$ and $i+1$ exchange their sites with rate $1$, independent of the velocity difference between the neighbors, and another in which a pair exchange their sites with a rate equal to their relative speed. In both cases, we find $m(t)\sim t$ for large $t$. In the first case, for a randomly picked agent, $m/t$, in the limit $t\to \infty$, is distributed uniformly on $[-1,1]$ for all continuous distributions of velocities. In the second case, the distribution is given by the distribution of the velocities itself, with a Galilean shift by the mean velocity. We also find the large time approach to the limiting forms and compare the results with numerical simulations. In contrast, if the exchange of velocities occurs at unit rate, independent of their values, and irrespective of which is faster, $m(t)/t$ for large $t$ is has a gaussian distribution, whose width varies as $t^{-1/2}$.
• We present GPU accelerated implementations of Markov chain algorithms to sample random tilings, dimers, and the six-vertex model.
• We broaden the study of the statistical physics of the spin-$S$ Blume-Capel model with ferromagnetic mean-field interactions $J$ in competition with short-range antiferromagnetic interactions $K$ in a linear chain in the thermodynamic limit. This work describes the critical behavior of the model when the $S$ takes a half integer and an integer value. In both cases the phase diagrams exhibit new ferromagnetic phases (for certain values of $K$) enclosed by branches emerging from the first-order frontiers of the pure ferromagnetic model. For finite temperatures the complex topologies were obtained by numerical minimization of the free energy.
• An important experimental signature of localization is the low-frequency AC conductivity, which typically vanishes as $\omega^{\phi}$. The exponent $\phi = 2$ for Anderson insulators, whereas for many body localized insulators $\phi$ is a continuously varying exponent $1 \le \phi \le 2$. In this work, we study the low-frequency AC conductivity of localized superconductors, in which disorder is strong enough to localize all quasiparticles, while remaining weak enough to leave superconductivity intact. We find that while the ac conductivity still follows the general form $\sigma(\omega) \sim \omega^{\phi}$, the exponent $\phi$ can be markedly different from the characteristic value for localized insulators. In particular, in certain symmetry classes at zero temperature, we obtain $\phi > 2$. We further identify an interesting temperature dependent crossover in the scaling form of the AC conductivity, which could be useful for the experimental characterization of localized superconductors.

Thomas Klimpel Apr 20 2017 09:16 UTC

This paper [appeared][1] in February 2016 in the peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal Chaos by the American Institute of Physics (AIP).

It has been reviewed publicly by amateurs both [favorably][2] and [unfavorably][3]. The favorable review took the last sentence of the abstract ("These invalid

...(continued)
Māris Ozols Sep 15 2016 21:30 UTC

Here is a link for those who also haven't heard of SciPost before: https://scipost.org/

Zoltán Zimborás Sep 15 2016 18:12 UTC

This is the very first paper of SciPost, waiting for the first paper of "Quantum" (http://quantum-journal.org). There are radical (and good!) changes going on in scientific publishing.

Stephen Jordan Apr 15 2016 15:02 UTC

This is a beautiful set of lecture notes.

Mile Gu Nov 20 2015 05:04 UTC

Good question! There shouldn't be any contradiction with the correspondence principle. The reason here is that the quantum models are built to simulate the output behaviour of macroscopic, classical systems, and are not necessarily macroscopic themselves. When we compare quantum and classical comple

...(continued)
hong Nov 20 2015 00:40 UTC

Interesting results. But, just wondering, does it contradict to the correspondence principle?

Marco Tomamichel Jul 17 2015 05:12 UTC

I am no expert at all on strongly correlated systems or topological order, but since you refer to information theory in your abstract, let me still ask you: What is the justification for using $I_2(A:B) = H_2(A) + H_2(B) - H_2(AB)$ for the Rényi mutual information? This quantity has no information-t

...(continued)
Jonathan Oppenehim May 06 2015 14:29 UTC

This article has generated a fair bit of discussion. But I found a few of the statements puzzling (Edgar Lozano also). Take for example, Theorem 1 (ii) (reversibility) which appears to contradict a number of previous results. Should we understand your work function as "work in the paradigm where we

...(continued)
Chris Perry Apr 08 2015 09:02 UTC

Hi Felix,

Thanks a lot for your comments. Yes, $X$ can be any state and we've made this clearer now in the paper - we don't need to assume that it is diagonal.

We've also noted more prominently that achievability of our result in the full thermodynamics case is only when the target state is b

...(continued)
Felix Leditzky Apr 03 2015 11:06 UTC

A question to Theorem 1:

In the process description in eq. (2), you mention that $X$ is any arbitrary state. However, in the proof of Theorem 1, in the converse part you assume that $[X,\sigma]=0$, or equivalently that $X$ is diagonal in the eigenbasis of $\sigma$. Similarly, in the achievability

...(continued)