We investigate neural techniques for end-to-end computational argumentation mining (AM). We frame AM both as a token-based dependency parsing and as a token-based sequence tagging problem, including a multi-task learning setup. Contrary to models that operate on the argument component level, we find that framing AM as dependency parsing leads to subpar performance results. In contrast, less complex (local) tagging models based on BiLSTMs perform robustly across classification scenarios, being able to catch long-range dependencies inherent to the AM problem. Moreover, we find that jointly learning 'natural' subtasks, in a multi-task learning setup, improves performance.
Submitted 20 Apr 2017 to Computation and Language
Published 21 Apr 2017
Updated 22 Apr 2017
Author comments: To be published at ACL 2017http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06104http://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.06104.pdfhttps://arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1704.06104